Latest Posts
"How do you hit the happy medium between Strict and Permissive parenting?" -- Mike
Most parents seem to struggle with questions about whether they're being too strict or too permissive. We don't want to be mean, of course, and we want to take our child's desires into account. So we compromise all the time on what we'd really like (straight A's, for instance, or daily music practice, or more help around the house.) But then we wonder, what if we had higher expectations, not as bad as Amy Chua, of course, but definitely more demanding than we've been, maybe our child would take academics more seriously, or be more helpful.....Where's that sweet spot between permissive and strict?
It's easier to find than you might think.
We've been confused because we're missing half the picture. Stay with me here, I promise this is worth taking a minute to understand. It completely sorts out the question about how strict to be.
If strictness and permissiveness are on a continuum, imagine them as a horizontal line (which, in the chart below, is called "Demandingness.") Now, add a vertical line. This one is the continuum of Responsiveness, meaning support, empathy and connection. So you end up with this:

What does it mean? It means that deciding how strict to be (how demanding) is only half the battle. You also have to decide how responsive to be. Diana Baumrind, who came up with this chart many years ago, labeled the parenting styles as follows:
High Demands/Low Responsiveness = Authoritarian
Low Demands/High Responsiveness = Permissive
Low Demands/Low Responsiveness = Uninvolved
High Demands/High Responsiveness = Authoritative
We've had decades to study these parenting styles, and here's what
child development researchers have discovered about the results of each:
Authoritarian- This, of course, would be Amy Chua's style. These
are parents who have high expectations of their kids, which is a good
thing, research shows. That’s how kids get good grades, learn to manage
themselves responsibly, and stay out of trouble. The problem with
these parents is that they don’t offer their kids much support. It’s
pull up your socks, straighten up and fly right, my way or the highway.
The kids are left on their own to learn to regulate their emotions, so
these households usually have anger-management issues. These parents
were usually parented this way themselves, and think they came out fine,
but psychologists would call them "defended." Research shows these
kids often end up either depressed or rebellious – and looking for love
in all the wrong places.
Permissive- These are parents who offer their kids lots of
support, which is terrific. Their problem is that they don’t also have
high expectations. Some of them believe that’s a good thing – they
wouldn’t want to get in the way of their child’s natural development.
Others just can’t bear to have their child face something difficult even
for a moment, so they make a lot of excuses for their kid. Most of
these parents are trying hard not to repeat their own parents’
tough-love parenting style, so they go overboard in the other
direction. Don’t get me wrong – you can never offer your child too much
respect and empathy. But if you let your child walk all over you or
other people, what are you teaching him about relationships? We all
need the experience of being loved through our disappointments and
coming out stronger on the other side. While letting kids discover their
own passions is terrific, kids often need help in structuring
themselves to explore those passions, or they become discouraged and
give up. Kids WANT to please, and they WANT to achieve -- depending on
how that's defined -- but they need parental help to learn the internal
discipline to accomplish their goals. These kids often become
self-centered and "spoiled," or vaguely unhappy and insecure. Amy Chua
would say that most American parents fall into this category.
Uninvolved- There have always been parents who can’t give their
kids the love and attention they need, either because of alcoholism,
narcissism, or just external pressures like needing to work two jobs to
support the family. But these parents seem to me to be even more
prevalent today, at least in some communities, where we rationalize
thrusting kids into daycare at ever earlier ages for ever-longer hours,
and then as they grow up we push them into the arms of their peer group,
so that we have little or no influence on them by the time they’re
teenagers. These parents sometimes vanish into drug addiction or
abandon the family, but there are plenty of seemingly normal families
where the parents are too focused on their own work or social lives to
engage deeply with their kids. It’s not unusual to see these parents
lavish money on their kids instead of attention. This is always a
message to the child that he isn’t worth loving, and if both parents are
uninvolved, you can pretty much count on the kid having substance abuse
or other major issues.
Authoritative parents- Notice this is NOT the same as
Authoritarian! It's a different word. Because of this common
confusion, I prefer to call this style "Empathic Limits," which
describes what it actually IS. These parents offer their kids lots of
empathy and support, like the permissive parents. But they also hold
high expectations, like the authoritarian parents. The difference is that because they're seeing things from their child's point of view, they know what expectations are appropriate for that child. Because of this respectful understanding, they're not imposing goals based on their needs; they're supporting their child to live up to the family's values and the child's own goals. Finally, they're offering their child complete support to achieve expectations over time.
For example, they aren’t expecting a three year old to clean up her toys by herself. But they may well be working with this three year old to help her clean up, making it fun, over and over and over, so that by six she really can clean up her toys herself. These parents are involved -- even demanding. They expect family dinners, lots of discussion straight through high school, excitement about learning, responsible, considerate behavior.
Because these parents
are comfortable with their emotions and able to regulate them, these
kids learn early to regulate their own emotions and thus are more open
to guidance. Not surprisingly, these kids stay close to their parents,
often describing a parent as the person they would most trust to talk
to about a problem. These kids are usually motivated learners in school,
and they’re also the ones that teachers describe as responsible and
well-liked; simply nice, considerate kids who are a pleasure to have
around. This parenting style, is, of course, the one that research
shows raises the best-adjusted kids.
Are you having an Aha! Moment? Most parents think the best parenting
course is the happy medium between strictness and demands. But they're
missing half the picture.
That means they settle for reduced expectations. It's fine to set
limits and have high expectations. Why would you compromise on the
values that are really important to you, such as how people in your
house speak to each other, or how much screen time they have, or whether they do their homework before they
Facebook?
But -- and this is a big but -- kids only accept these high
expectations because of the support they get. That means that along
with limits, these kids get tremendous empathy, and step by step help in
learning to manage themselves. They get help processing emotions so
they can actually stay calm rather than yelling at you. They also
experience respect, which means their parents listen to what's important
to them and find win-win solutions.
The difference between Authoritarian Parenting and Empathy with Limits is huge: the
understanding and respect offered to the child. The difference between
Permissive and Empathy with Limits is the high expectations; parents are able to help kids live the values that are important to them. And the
difference in parental involvement should be obvious – these parents are
the most involved of any of the parenting styles. Which is probably
why they’re happier parents.
Happier parents, happier children. That's what I call win/win parenting.




is Responsive as Permissive. We're actually stricter than most of them!
is generated from their own set of thoughts and behaviors. Expectations however are a setup to disappointment and conditionality. Read parenting for social change How on earth do you think you can put a whole world of different parenting styles into a one-dimensional,
4 option chart?
to let our kids watch TV, or get sucked into consumer culture, or be forced to acculturate in ways that deny their authentic selves. We expect our child to live authentically in our family with respect and consideration -- and of course we insure that by treating
our child with respect and consideration. We expect our child to learn emotional intelligence and self-responsibility, which is why we work on regulating our own emotions and offering respectful support to our child's goals. If we are truly empathic in our
relationship with our child -- which is the precondition of this quadrant in the chart above -- our expectations will be completely in accordance with the needs of our child. Naturally, we are not setting goals for our child most of the time; we are their
guide, not their dictator! If you read through my website, it should be clear that my definition of parenting is about SERVING our child, never pushing or pulling her. That is the only kind of guidance that empowers children, which is, after all, our goal.
I agree with you that a one-dimensional chart can't possibly cover a whole world of parenting styles. The point of the chart is to evolve the simple continuum that our culture seems to think encapsulates parenting, which is to find a happy medium between strict
and permissive. Obviously, this misses connection and respect, which are the most important aspects of any relationship, including parenting. So the point of this chart (which, by the way, I did not invent) is to use that strict-permissive continuum as the
starting place -- because that is where most parents start -- and to add this critical missing dimension, which I am referring to here as Empathy. Would it be great to tease out the various aspects of this into a multi-dimensional chart? Yes! I'd love to see
one, if you can figure out what it would look like!
totally agree with high expectations and high support. Sometimes I suspect that the "trouble" with parents, if I may say it, is that they are not high achievers themselves. If they are not high achievers and find motivation difficult or lack creativity or
believe they are disadvantaged, then they're going to automatically teach their children the same if only by example. I doubt you will ever find Gates or Buffet or Obama any other top achiever not advocate for high expectations. After the parent gets their
head around expectations, then they have to figure out how to support and encourage the child. I doubt that children will spontaneously decide how to invest into intellectual and emotional assets that will only pay dividends when they are in their 20s and
older.